Client: LH Ventures
Users: Retail Buyers
My Roles: UX Research lead
Generative research: contextual inquiry, card sorting, semi-structured interviews, surveys.
Evaluative research: participatory design, storyboarding, think-alouds, interactive prototyping.
Other skills used: UX/copy writing, print design, wire-framing.
Retail buyers have to make sense of a ton of information coming at them from their past, present, and future assortments. What are the most desirable features for an enterprise-level order management tool which will have the most significant impact to buyers’ ability to make smarter buys and ultimately increase their productivity?
Twenty20 brings the ‘look and feel’ of consumer e-commerce to the enterprise side of the retail industry. By keeping buyers visually connected to their assortments at all stages of the buying timeline, they have the ability to gain insights at a glance that used to be hidden behind rows upon rows of product SKUs in spreadsheet pivot tables. Furthermore, our tool preserves the flexibility to slice and dice the data most important to each buyer in various markets, WITHOUT requiring a custom solution for each retailer.
What information do buyers need at their fingertips in order to be successful?
We talked to 30 buyers and their colleagues to learn about their jobs and what they need in order to be successful. Through a combination of contextual inquiries, semi-structured interviews, and open card sorting activities, we became quite familiar with a buyer’s workflow and what information they need in order to be great at their job.
Analogous Domain Exploration
I led a week-long sprint in which we stepped outside the retail industry and into other domains in order to look at the buyer’s activities from new perspectives. In addition to producing unique solution spaces, this helped cement our understanding of a buyer’s main activities.
Interpretation & Synthesis
We clustered our notes from each interview into groups on a wall in our office until larger themes started to emerge. When we felt like the notes on the wall represented a comprehensive set of the things discussed in our interviews, we stepped back and created a set of “I need” statements that could be used for the creation of personas.
The other artifact to come out of our exhaustive research synthesis is this “Timeline of a Buy” which illustrates the retail buyer’s process, from pre-purchase to out of stock, and helped us map key decision points to different stages of the buying timeline.
It’s not about giving the buyers the information they need, it’s about helping them make sense of the information they’ve found on their own.
1) People think in narratives, not numbers.
2) There is more than one opportunity to turn any buy into a good buy.
3) Connecting the Dots.
We know that great buyers do a lot of extra work in order to make sense of the information they find… so how can we make that easier?
By translating our research insights into three guiding design principles, we felt confident we could move forward into a solution-oriented mindset:
Storyboard speed dating
We made dozens of storyboards to explore solution spaces and validate some of our key assumptions about what kinds of tools would help buyers the most. Each one was shown in sequence to participants in our user group (both in-person and over Google Hangouts) and by gauging the response to these various ‘preferred futures’ we were able to focus future sprints on the ideas that got the most enthusiastic responses.
In order to encourage the receptiveness of our conclusions, we were sure to include our client LH Ventures in or process—the earlier you get the client involved, the more ownership they feel they have over the final product. This 2x2 matrix was an exercise we did with our clients in which our team ranked buyer “need" statements from least to most impactful to success, and then our clients cross-ranked them from easiest to most difficult to implement. This ultimately helped us focus on designing features that most effectively addressed the most urgent needs.
Remote Collaborative Design
This is an example of a closed cart sorting activity we conducted remotely with several buyers to help focus our design strategy going forward. Many retail buyers are located in New York City or Los Angeles, so a lot of our tests needed to be able to be conducted remotely. Google Drawings was a great way to create digital artifacts that we could share with our users and watch them manipulate in real-time.
The four key features at the core of solution.
Through an iterative process of prototyping conducted in weekly sprints and using a variety of tools, we gradually started to see four key features emerge that reflected our design principles and could be could be considered feasible for our client’s software:
Time Travel | Filter & Sort | Set Alerts | Save Views
A Visual Tool for a Visual Job.
Not too surprisingly, buyers responded with the most enthusiasm to the prototypes and storyboards that contained product images in them. Visual information is very powerful, and too many of their tools are currently “numbers only.” Keeping eyes on product saves buyers time and promotes more glanceable insights. This realization helped define the look and feel of our solution.
Wireframing the UI
I linked these wireframes with Invision and created a clickable prototype that we then user tested with several buyers via Invision’s remote prototype testing feature. Our prototypes were then iterated on based on feedback we received from our users.
Interaction Design: Time Travel
Because complex interactions are difficult to recreate in Invision, I designed this interaction in Principle to illustrate how a buyer might move forward and backward in time to supplement one of the clickable prototypes in our user tests. Buyers were asked if they understood what the intent of the “driver” of this video was doing.
Feedback from Buyers...
Buyers were impressed with how quickly we were able to learn about and address the issues that preventing them from being more successful. One of the most gratifying moments during user tests for our final design sprint was when a buyer successfully performed a task that we hadn’t even assigned her yet. We were going to instruct her to 1) explore the performance of a specific type of item using our prototype software, and 2) make a decision about what items to order for a future assortment, based on the insights from her exploration. Before we could even assign these tasks, she voluntarily offered her insights!
Feedback from our Clients...
Our Clients were impressed with our ability to recruit so many SMEs for our research and testing, without any help from them (they purposefully withheld their own contacts so as to avoid creating echo chamber). After their initial hesitation to pivot from their original idea, their confidence was restored when we backed up our ideas with all of our research and user test responses.
Final Deliverables for our Client
Along with some early feedback from testing our design, we handed our clients two printed reports containing annotated screenshots and detailed descriptions of each core feature of the product, as well our research methods and other materials that supported our conclusions. I was responsible for the printed material, including much of the writing and layout.
Illustration for our Client Report:
1) Learn the vernacular of the user and use it.
When interviewing users in an unfamiliar domain, using vocabulary that signifies I have some domain expertise (I’ve done my research to better understand your field) will keep the interview feeling like a conversation and prevent it from turning into an instructional lecture. The first round of user interviews I conducted with retail buyers felt more like they were giving me an overview of their job, and avoiding those nitty gritty details that would go over my head. However, it was in those nitty gritty details that most of their pain points were, so in order to get actionable insights for our project to move forward I had to make sure I subtly communicated domain knowledge with our users (retail buyers) by using their vernacular even before they did.
2) Get your client involved early in your design process.
Client skepticism can be mitigated or avoided entirely by getting them involved in the design process early! Once we began having more frequent check-ins and especially after running a co-design session with them, LH Ventures was much more on-board with the ideas we produced.
3) Start user recruitment efforts early, and never stop.
Snowball recruiting and leveraging social and professional networks must start early and happen often in order to fuel sustained participation in contextual interviews and user tests. At the beginning of our project we were disappointed with the rate of return of the buyers we were reaching out to on LinkedIn and other platforms. However a trickle gradually became a steady stream, and by the end of the project we had conducted interviews and tests with over 60 retail professionals!
Many Thanks to my teammates...
Gena Hong, Hannah Rosen, JuHo Yoon, and Amanda Holt who helped put together such a successful and creative capstone project.